Contact

Letter Cosigners French Version Background

Reference Notes

This part of the site is a reading guide rather than a point of contact. It explains how the letter, the cosigner list, and the French version fit together so that readers can find the material they need. Questions about the text are best answered by consulting the letter and the list of signatories directly.

[email protected]

Telegram X WhatsApp

Letter Against the Prorogation of Parliament

The Core Constitutional ConcernThe letter argues that prorogation, the formal ending of a parliamentary session, should not be used to avoid scrutiny of the government. It asks readers to consider whether suspending sittings weakens the basic principle that the executive remains accountable to elected members of Parliament.

Timing and Parliamentary AccountabilityThe letter focuses on when prorogation takes place and what it interrupts. Pausing committee work, question periods, and pending legislation can limit the ability of members to hold ministers to account, and the letter explains why that timing matters for the public.

The Full List of CosignersThe site contains the names of 175 academics who endorsed the original text. The list includes political scientists, legal scholars, and university philosophers from several universities, so readers can see the range of disciplines behind the statement.

The French Version of the TextA French version of the letter is available on the same site. It allows readers in Quebec and other French-speaking communities to follow the arguments in the language of their own public debate.

Against the Prorogation of Parliament

Letter

Cosigners

French Version

This site reproduces an open letter on the prorogation of Parliament, written by Daniel Weinstock and signed by academics. It is provided for reference and reading.